intermediate / 60 minutes
Blog Post Generator Prompt and Review
Use a blog post generator prompt only after the angle, structure and evidence boundary are settled, then check the draft line by line.
Result: An editable blog draft that follows an approved brief, carries source placeholders and has passed a factual and editorial review.
Jump to prompt ↓5 steps to a reviewable draft
- 01
Lock the editorial brief
Confirm the reader task, article angle, planned sections and source boundary. Do not ask the model to repair an unclear brief with more prose.
Result: A final writing instruction that tells the draft what it must accomplish.
- 02
Mark the source gaps
Put confirmed facts, approved examples and missing evidence in separate fields. Remove quotes or statistics that cannot be traced to a source.
Result: A source pack that protects the draft from invented detail.
- 03
Produce the working draft
Ask for clear prose that follows the brief, keeps placeholders visible and avoids claims the source pack cannot support.
Result: A complete first draft with unsupported detail marked for the editor.
Your prompt
Draft an article from the approved brief and source material below. Reader task and article angle: {{brief}} Required sections: {{structure}} Confirmed sources and examples: {{sources}} Style and editorial constraints: {{constraints}} Write a draft with clear section transitions and useful explanation. Use [NEEDS SOURCE] for any statement that needs evidence. Do not invent data, quotes, product capabilities, customer stories, legal claims or links. Keep the draft editable; do not write a publication note or an author bio.Example inputDraft an article about reviewable AI content briefs using a source-checked outline and an editor's workflow example.
Example outputA brief should state the reader job before it lists headings. Example: [NEEDS SOURCE].
- 04
Run the factual pass
Check names, dates, numbers, quotes, links and product assertions against the source pack. Replace or remove anything the source does not support.
Result: A draft whose factual claims have a traceable basis.
- 05
Send to editorial review
Give the editor the draft, source pack and unresolved questions. Record what changed during the factual pass.
Result: A reviewable article, not an unattended AI output.
What a finished draft should contain
A 1,200-word working draft that follows a defined angle, marks two missing sources and gives an editor the material needed to make a publication decision.
What this process cannot decide
- A drafted article may still repeat common advice or miss the reader's real question.
- The model cannot verify a source, approve a quote or make the final editorial call.