advanced / 55 minutes
AI Market Positioning Workflow
Compare possible market positions for a defined audience, then retain the evidence, uncertainty and business decision that separates a useful option from a slogan.
Result: A positioning options sheet with audience, category context, differentiated claim, source evidence, tradeoffs, risks and a decision to validate.
Jump to prompt ↓5 steps to a reviewable draft
- 01
Frame the choice
State the audience, category context and business decision. Avoid treating a preference for a phrase as a positioning decision.
Result: A positioning question with a named owner and audience.
- 02
Separate evidence from aspiration
List confirmed customer language, product facts, competitor observations and desired future claims in separate groups.
Result: A source sheet that makes the evidence boundary visible before writing begins.
- 03
Draft positioning options
Ask for several options that show the audience, problem, supported distinction, proof and tradeoff instead of polishing one line too early.
Result: Options that make the proof and cost of each position easy to compare.
Your prompt
Draft market positioning options from the supplied evidence. Audience and decision: {{scope}} Customer evidence: {{customer_evidence}} Product facts and offer constraints: {{product_facts}} Competitor observations: {{competitor_evidence}} For each option, return audience, problem, category context, supported distinction, proof source, tradeoff, risk, unsupported claim and question to validate. Mark a deduction as [HYPOTHESIS]. Do not invent differentiation, customer demand, market share, product capability or performance results.Example inputPosition a reporting template for small agencies using interview notes, product pages and three competitor comparisons.
Example outputOption: reporting support for agency-client communication. Proof source: customer interviews. Differentiated claim: [HYPOTHESIS]. Tradeoff: narrower appeal outside agencies.
- 04
Challenge the differentiated claim
Review the options with product and market owners. Remove any difference that depends on a feature, customer result or competitor fact that no source supports.
Result: A smaller set of defensible positions and a clear evidence gap.
- 05
Record the validation decision
Choose the position to test or the evidence to collect next, then record who will decide after the result arrives.
Result: A positioning decision that can move into a strategy or experiment plan.
What a finished draft should contain
A positioning options sheet that connects each proposed claim to source evidence, exposes tradeoffs and sets a validation decision.
What this process cannot decide
- Positioning requires product and commercial judgment that a model cannot supply.
- Public competitor material and small research sets may leave important facts unknown.
