intermediate / 50 minutes

AI Competitor Analysis Workflow

Build a comparison matrix that separates observed offers and messages from interpretation, then use it to decide what needs further research.

Result: A competitor comparison matrix with source links, observed patterns, unanswered questions and one positioning decision to investigate.

Jump to prompt ↓

5 steps to a reviewable draft

  1. 01

    Set the comparison boundary

    Name the segment, geography, product area and decision. Exclude companies that do not compete for the same customer choice.

    Result: A short comparison scope that explains why each company belongs in the review.

  2. 02

    Capture observable evidence

    Record page URLs, offer wording, audience cues, proof, pricing statements and calls to action exactly as presented. Keep the capture date beside each source.

    Result: A source pack that another reviewer can open and inspect.

  3. 03

    Build the comparison matrix

    Ask for a matrix based only on the supplied source pack, with observations separate from possible implications.

    Result: A matrix that makes evidence gaps as visible as the observed patterns.

    Your prompt

    Create a competitor comparison matrix from the supplied sources.
    
    Market and decision: {{scope}}
    Companies and source links: {{sources}}
    Comparison fields: {{fields}}
    
    Return columns for company, observed audience, offer, proof shown, call to action, source link, observation, uncertainty and question to investigate. Put [NOT OBSERVED] where the source does not support a field. Do not infer revenue, market share, customer satisfaction, strategy or internal business performance.
    Example input

    Compare three reporting tools for small agencies using their public pricing and product pages.

    Example output

    Company: Example Tool. Offer: weekly client reports. Proof shown: [NOT OBSERVED]. Question: does the offer include client-facing sharing?

  4. 04

    Challenge the interpretation

    Review the matrix with someone who knows the market. Remove statements that turn a page headline into a fact about the company or its customers.

    Result: A comparison with a defensible boundary between observation and interpretation.

  5. 05

    Choose the next research move

    Turn the most useful gap or pattern into a research question, owner and decision date.

    Result: A focused follow-up instead of a static competitor spreadsheet.

What a finished draft should contain

A comparison matrix that records what each source actually says and turns the remaining uncertainty into a short positioning research plan.

What this process cannot decide

  • Public pages can be outdated, incomplete or tailored to a different audience.
  • A comparison does not prove why customers choose one company over another.

Privacy choices

Analytics

Analytics helps us understand which guides and WexAI app links are useful. It never includes prompt text or tool input.