intermediate / 50 minutes
AI Competitor Analysis Workflow
Build a comparison matrix that separates observed offers and messages from interpretation, then use it to decide what needs further research.
Result: A competitor comparison matrix with source links, observed patterns, unanswered questions and one positioning decision to investigate.
Jump to prompt ↓5 steps to a reviewable draft
- 01
Set the comparison boundary
Name the segment, geography, product area and decision. Exclude companies that do not compete for the same customer choice.
Result: A short comparison scope that explains why each company belongs in the review.
- 02
Capture observable evidence
Record page URLs, offer wording, audience cues, proof, pricing statements and calls to action exactly as presented. Keep the capture date beside each source.
Result: A source pack that another reviewer can open and inspect.
- 03
Build the comparison matrix
Ask for a matrix based only on the supplied source pack, with observations separate from possible implications.
Result: A matrix that makes evidence gaps as visible as the observed patterns.
Your prompt
Create a competitor comparison matrix from the supplied sources. Market and decision: {{scope}} Companies and source links: {{sources}} Comparison fields: {{fields}} Return columns for company, observed audience, offer, proof shown, call to action, source link, observation, uncertainty and question to investigate. Put [NOT OBSERVED] where the source does not support a field. Do not infer revenue, market share, customer satisfaction, strategy or internal business performance.Example inputCompare three reporting tools for small agencies using their public pricing and product pages.
Example outputCompany: Example Tool. Offer: weekly client reports. Proof shown: [NOT OBSERVED]. Question: does the offer include client-facing sharing?
- 04
Challenge the interpretation
Review the matrix with someone who knows the market. Remove statements that turn a page headline into a fact about the company or its customers.
Result: A comparison with a defensible boundary between observation and interpretation.
- 05
Choose the next research move
Turn the most useful gap or pattern into a research question, owner and decision date.
Result: A focused follow-up instead of a static competitor spreadsheet.
What a finished draft should contain
A comparison matrix that records what each source actually says and turns the remaining uncertainty into a short positioning research plan.
What this process cannot decide
- Public pages can be outdated, incomplete or tailored to a different audience.
- A comparison does not prove why customers choose one company over another.
