intermediate / 45 minutes
AI Campaign Performance Review Workflow
Create a read-only campaign narrative that documents the objective, data period, changes made and questions to test before anyone claims a cause.
Result: A campaign performance review with data definitions, observed results, relevant changes, limitations and the next measurement or experiment decision.
Jump to prompt ↓5 steps to a reviewable draft
- 01
Freeze the review window
Record the campaign dates, reporting timezone, metric definitions and data source. Do not compare periods with different definitions as if they were identical.
Result: A review scope that others can reproduce from the same export.
- 02
List meaningful changes
Note changes to audience, offer, creative, targeting, budget, delivery or tracking. Mark unknown changes instead of filling the gap with a theory.
Result: A dated change log beside the metric table.
- 03
Draft the performance review
Ask for a narrative that stays close to the supplied data and labels possible explanations as questions.
Result: A review that distinguishes the numbers from the story people want to tell about them.
Your prompt
Draft a campaign performance review from the supplied records. Objective: {{objective}} Data period and metric definitions: {{data_context}} Metric export: {{metrics}} Dated campaign changes: {{changes}} Use sections for objective, observed results, comparison basis, changes during the period, data limits, possible explanations, questions to test and next decision. Cite only supplied figures. Label an explanation as [TO TEST]. Do not claim causality, lift, incrementality, attribution certainty or business impact without supporting evidence.Example inputReview a two-week workshop campaign with email sends, landing-page visits and registrations; creative changed on day eight.
Example outputObserved result: registrations rose after day eight. Explanation: [TO TEST]. The period also included a new email subject line.
- 04
Verify the figures and language
Reconcile every figure with the export and challenge causal wording. Ask the data owner about missing tracking or delayed conversions.
Result: A narrative that keeps factual reporting separate from interpretation.
- 05
Choose one next test or decision
Convert the most useful uncertainty into a test card or an explicit decision to stop, continue or collect more data.
Result: A performance review that leads to an accountable next move.
What a finished draft should contain
A short campaign review that reports the data honestly, records changes during the period and names the claim that still needs testing.
What this process cannot decide
- Campaign data often has tracking gaps, delays and competing changes.
- A review describes what happened in the data; it does not prove why it happened.
