Compare sources, map unanswered questions and prepare a research brief with reusable prompts.
See where two accounts agree, disagree or leave gaps.
Compare the supplied sources for {{question}}.
Source A:
{{source_a}}
Source B:
{{source_b}}
Return a table of claim, A's position, B's position, supporting passage and unresolved question. Do not fill gaps with outside knowledge. Distinguish disagreement from different scope or dates.Question: response time. A: support replies within one business day. B: live chat is available weekdays 9–5.
Both describe support but different measures: response target versus chat availability. Neither establishes round-the-clock support.
Before you use itCheck that differences in scope were not labeled as contradictions.
Turn an incomplete brief into a short research agenda.
Read this decision brief:
{{brief}}
Decision deadline: {{deadline}}.
List the five unanswered questions most likely to change the decision. For each, explain why it matters, suggest a source to consult and distinguish what is unknown from what is already supported. Do not answer questions without evidence.Brief: choose a booking tool. Need SMS reminders; export and cancellation policies are unknown.
Questions: Can records be exported in a usable format? What happens when a booking is canceled? Ask the provider's documentation before ranking options.
Before you use itKeep questions tied to the actual decision; a source suggestion is not a verified finding.
Make source notes readable for a teammate who needs to decide.
Create a one-page brief for {{audience}} from these notes:
{{notes}}
Decision: {{decision}}.
Use sections: question, supported findings, tradeoffs, unknowns, next step. Attach a source label to each finding. Do not turn an assumption into a recommendation. Keep it below 400 words.Notes: A exports CSV (A docs). B has SMS (B docs). Team has not ranked export versus SMS.
Findings: A CSV export; B SMS. Tradeoff: preferences not ranked. Next step: choose the required capability and verify the other option against it.
Before you use itOpen each deciding source and confirm that the brief preserves its qualifications.
Copy a prompt, replace the text in double braces with your details, then adjust the first draft.
A comparison is useful when its criteria match a choice you need to make. Tell the assistant what could change that choice before asking it to summarize everything.
A proposed source is a place to look, not proof. Read it before promoting a research question into a finding.
See where two accounts agree, disagree or leave gaps.
Compare the supplied sources for {{question}}.
Source A:
{{source_a}}
Source B:
{{source_b}}
Return a table of claim, A's position, B's position, supporting passage and unresolved question. Do not fill gaps with outside knowledge. Distinguish disagreement from different scope or dates.Question: response time. A: support replies within one business day. B: live chat is available weekdays 9–5.
Both describe support but different measures: response target versus chat availability. Neither establishes round-the-clock support.